A child’s curiosity and natural desire to learn are like a tiny flame, easily extinguished unless it’s protected and given fuel. This book will help you as a parent both protect that flame of curiosity and supply it with the fuel necessary to make it burn bright throughout your child’s life. Let’s ignite our children’s natural love of learning!
November 14th, 2014
Transparency, simplicity, publicity: Words for GOP to live by in 2015
The following op-ed was published this week by Fox News. It was written, in part, to publicize the forthcoming publication of Feardom.
Every Republican newly elected to the U.S. Senate shares at least one thing in common: they each campaigned on repealing the Affordable Care Act.
As Americans all across the political spectrum prepare for a fresh round of debate regarding this controversial policy reform, it’s important to pause and address how it was adopted in the first place.
If we’re to believe one of its creators, “ObamaCare” came into existence only because of “the stupidity of the American voter.” Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economist and chief architect of the law, admitted last year to a friendly audience that it “was written in a tortured way” to dodge legislative obstacles, and that “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” that “was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”
Let’s take Gruber at his word—that the success of the president’s signature policy proposal was predicated on ignorance and obfuscation. One must conclude from his explanation that the Obama administration relied upon—and helped to maintain—the electorate’s alleged stupidity; in the eyes of a politician, an ignorant populace is a malleable one. “Great is truth,” wrote the dystopian author Aldous Huxley, “but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.”
This ignorance was fostered through a number of false claims made both before and after ObamaCare’s passage. The president promised Americans that, “If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period.” Families were told that their premiums would be lowered “up to $2,500 for a typical family per year.” Those who already had insurance were pacified by being told that their “only impact is that their insurance is stronger, better and more secure than it was before. Full stop. That’s it. They don’t have to worry about anything else.”
Whether it be through omission of truth or outright lies such as these, designed to neutralize the opposition, politicians routinely keep the public in the dark and thus unable to mount a defense and oppose policies (or politicians) to which they object. Without the ability to recognize and respond to observable problems, an ignorant public must rely upon what Christopher Guzelian, a legal theorist, calls “risk communication”—the (often false) information conveyed to them by politicians and the media describing what threats exist, how scared they should be, and what measures they should support in response.
A policy predicated on deception and ignorance is ripe for repeal, but as the new Republican majority begins to agitate for reform, they should emphatically reject the tools and tactics used by Gruber and his associates by legislating, at a minimum, according to these three core principles:
First, transparency. Barack Obama campaigned on this promise, and has miserably failed. While Gruber was correct to note that a “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” Republicans should repudiate this tactic and take the higher road by holding open meetings, providing draft text of legislation well in advance of a vote, including their political opponents in all relevant discussions, and being forthcoming, honest, and sincere with their constituents throughout the entire process. This alone would be a breath of fresh air, and perhaps increase their single digit approval rating.
Second, simplicity. The Affordable Care Act is 381,517 words long—86.7 times longer than the U.S. Constitution and twice as long as the New Testament. “It will be of little avail to the people,” wrote James Madison, “that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” Republicans should commit to simple legislation and simple explanations, treating the American people as their equals—nay, employers—rather than uneducated underlings unable to comprehend congressional complexity, whether intentionally “tortured” or not.
Finally, publicity. If Americans are uniformed on a policy being proposed by congressional Republicans, then they should commit to proactively educating the public, using any and all means possible—and with substance, not sound bytes. A voter’s supposed “stupidity” should be seen as detrimental, rather than politically advantageous.
Republicans have been given an opportunity that they should not squander. Earning the public’s trust, and attempting to reverse course, will require more than talking points and tweaking policy—systemic changes are needed. A new Senate majority now exists for the Republicans in large measure because of bold promises made to the public. We now wait to see if we’ve been lied to once again.
5 Responses to “Transparency, simplicity, publicity: Words for GOP to live by in 2015”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Well written. Thank you
Thanks for reprinting this.
ObamaCare is the signature of Obama’s presidency, not because of the content of the law. The totality of force used to get thing into law is exemplary of his time in office.
Even without a total repeal of AFA, Republicans could provide good governance by eschewing every misuse of power committed over the last six years.
How long until someone (not mentioning any names) posts a comment about how we’re all just interconnected cogs in society, and, since obamacare is “legal,” it shouldn’t matter to us how much falsehood and obfuscation was involved in the law’s passage?
Before the Republicans try to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act, they need to have a public health care plan to take its place. Of all of the 30 industrialized countries, the U.S. is the only one without a universal health care for its citizens. This is a disgrace. The best solution would have been to have a Medicare for all type system, which would have worked very well to provide universal health care for everyone and to provide the best vehicle to control the rampant inflation of health care costs.
Because that was not a politically viable solution, the Administration and the Congress settled for a Massachusetts style health care plan that was a originally Republican proposal several years before. Of course the present day Republicans opposed the plan even though it came from members of their own party simply because President Obama proposed it.
No one, especially Democrats believe that the current system is without flaws. However, it does prevent insurers from denying coverage for preexisting conditions, allows children to be covered until age 26, has provided health care coverage for millions who otherwise would be without, and has helped to curb out of control rising health care costs.
The best solution would be to throw it out and provide Medicare for all. Medicare works, and has a much lower cost of administration than any private insurer. The next best would be to keep the parts of the Affordable Health Care Act that are working, and to fix those that aren’t. Just repealing the Affordable Health Care Act, and taking our country back to the untenable conditions prior to its passage is NOT a viable option. Any Republican or Libertarian who espouses that plan is guilty of the “I’ve got mine, so screw everyone else” mentality.
How can the public grasp a law that was never even discussed, debated, nor even given to our Congress? This is government “trust me I know more than you besides you will like it when we pass it,” does not want anyone to know.
Since the days of Teddy Roosevelt more elected presidents assume that the popular vote by the people for him dictate’s him as Ruler! This is because the Senate now elected by popular vote and they even want to take away the electorate vote..hence the political party who has control of the Senate and the Presidency wins.